Why Chromium has code owners

My favourite thing about the Chromium code is this enum of cats and all the comments in that file. My second favourite thing is OWNER files. Guess what this post is about (hint: it’s not about cats NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT CATS, OK?)

Edit: In a clear and deliberate conspiracy, the cats have been removed from Chromium. The old new cool thing is pickles, and the new new cool thing is Count Von Counts. Bonus points to @thakis for finding that last one. 💁

Why should you care?

Owners in Chromium are people who own an area of code. This can be a small feature (the chrome://settings page) or a giant area (all of the Cocoa UI). You don’t have to be an owner to be successful – you get to be an owner because you want to. This usually means that you have contributed a lot to that particular nugget of code, have acquired a slightly unhealthy obsession for it (symptoms: if you’ve whispered “my precious” to a line of code in the last hour, you will make a great code owner one day), and generally care about its well being. I have been trying (unsuccessfully) for years to be an owner of pizza; hit me up if you have any leads.

Owners are gatekeepers of code, and their main responsibility is making sure the code doesn’t go to shit. Comments that make sense. No copy pasting, no hacks, no soup for you. None of that “I don’t really know how to make this code better so I’m going to merge it and run” nonsense. They are the very model of a modern Major-General, they know the kings of England, and they quote the fights historical.

TL; DR: owners won’t let you merge crappy code. Imagine if each of the 2000 Chromium commiters merged a random hack in one of the 7 million lines of code we have. IMAGINE. 🔥🔥🔥

What it means for owners

Realtalk: being an owner means that people will send you a lot of code to review, because your blessing (or “LGTM”) is required for that code to be committed. @sky is an owner of the Windows UI code, and he does something like 500+ reviews a quarter. And also writes code. And helps me out when I (invariably) break the UI. He’s pretty much the best.


👉 Developers trust owners to not be insane. Owners trust developers not to try to commit stuff behind their back. This is why it works. 👈

What it means for developers

First, when you’re stuck, you know who to ask questions (an owner!). Second, in order for you to commit any code, you need to get the owners’ approval for your changes.

Here’s an example of a code review. I like to explicitly mention which owner should review which file, because one person might own multiple files/areas in a given CL (if you’re a chrome/browser owner, you own ALL of the things), but might not be required to review all of them.

So, who owns profile_info_cache.cc? Everyone named in the chrome/browser/profiles/OWNERS file. On top of that, everyone up the directory tree (so in chrome/browser/OWNERS) is also an owner. If you stumble on a directory that doesn’t have an owners file (for example chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/profiles), just crawl on up until you find the closest one (in this case, you would add an owner from chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/OWNERS. This is also useful if you do a fairly innocent refactor that touches a lot of files, like renaming a method. In that case, rather than adding 17 different owners, you can just get one, root owner and run with that.

How YOU can get owner files in your project

If you want to implement owner files for your projects (YAY!), you need to do a couple of things:

« Contributing to Chromium: an illustrated guide Keypress is bananas »